Re: Wingfield Coats-of-Hands
The newest Tickencote photo generally seems to day of about 1650 in respect in order to page 3of Certain Details of your Wingfield Members of the family by Wingfield, John M.London: Murray, 1925 republished by Wingfield Relatives Area within the 1991. ISBN0-937543-03-nine.
“Sir Robert Wyngfeld out of Letheringham, their [Sir Robert just who d. ily off half dozen otherwise 7 sons and fivedaughters, and is out-of your, along with his children and you may grandchildren,whom played no small part from the items of your world off England, you to definitely thepresent works [Wingfield’s publication] food.
Their earliest young man is Sir John Wyngfeld of Letheringham, Knight, whom, which have hiswife, setting the 2 main numbers on the old pedigree oils drawings whichprovide the topic of these records.
There are two main of them oictures in existence, nearly identically similar, oneat Tickencote Hallway, Rutland, in addition to almost every other from the Boughton Domestic, Northants. Itis unidentified the unique and you will the content.
This few try encircled regarding the greatest and you will bottom registers from the almost all their 16 college students, inside for every situation Wingfield house (1) Bosville and you may (2) quarterly, Goushell and the chequy coating
The main one during the Tickncote, now belonging to Lieut.-Col. John MauriceWingfield, is actually painted into the fabric, possesses probably had the experience due to the fact about1650, as it is most likely so it had been the house or property of your past SirRobert Wingfield regarding Upton, within the Northamptonshire, who’s considered has actually diedduring new commonwealth, and many out-of whoever oils images was actually within thattime eliminated in order to his cousin’s domestic during the Tickencote, when Upton is sold, andwhich will always be here.”
The writer says that “the image inside the Boughton home could easily be tracedback so you can 1677” (page 4) and provide several comments in the middle 1700srefering so you can path of picture and its speech toward Duke ofMontague.
The writer claims for the page six one “When, or of the whose order, otherwise of the exactly who they waspainted, continues to be a question uncertain by the gurus.”
Once again, my concerns for the group heart perhaps not in the genealogicalconnections out-of the players, (the new Wingfields were explored fairlywell, and you may despite my typo into the Howard family relations, I really do have the pedigreeaccurately annotated here in RI) but with the reasoning where protects weredisplayed because of the second two generations. I do believe We have a sense of just what”should” be on the fresh new respective shields, and you will are wondering as to the reasons, in cases like this,that doesn’t seem to be what exactly is shown. Both I’m mistaken into the myunderstanding, or the Wingfield’s was basically to play rather punctual and you may sagging withtheir arms for almost all purpose and therefore we may not even discover.
Kelly, thank you for delivering myself pictures, and you can compliment of Tim to own protecting me personally the trouble away from placing them on the web. Searching this over in addition to the pedigrees inside Viscount Powerscourt’s _Muniments of the Old Saxon Category of Wingfield_, the firm is actually clear in my opinion; additionally, it seems that there’s one glaring heraldic error, in the guts, perhaps the supply of their distress. I will admit We haven’t double-looked the youngsters’ impalings and i get one other unanswered matter (what’s the coroneted lozenge in the lower check in?). The brand new red traces seem to layered with this image from the book commonly such helpful, additionally the annotated ‘key’ will not in reality hot Chandler, IN girl reproduce the text captions and you may will not define someone whose possession are offered.
There are two fascinating what to the picture indicating a few other focuses. First, they focuses primarily on a 15th-century relationships and reveals the children of that wedding, but zero after matter. 2nd, they reveals an equity part that have lineage right down to the new seventeenth century.
The new main committee is the relationships out of Sir John Wingfield (d. 1481) to help you Age, dau. off Sir John Fitz Lewis and you can Anne (Montacute). The two figures kneel in the middle, consequently they are surmounted by impalings of its parents’ arms from inside the wreaths. The new heraldic error is here now, because the Sir John’s father’s end each other house and you will impales Gousell (in reality, Gousell quartered using this chequy coating). It is a blunder. It is noticeable that the quartering out of Gousell therefore the chequy coat will come in when this occurs, that it can’t be each other quartered and impaled about wreath (until, from the implication, Sir John who d. 1481 had drawn an enthusiastic Oedipus and married his personal mother). Things I don’t acknowledge ‘s the coroneted lozenge hanging over the people from the straight down check in.