Background Belonging: Exactly how Stereotypical Cues Impression Gender Involvement inside the Pc Research

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. Grams., and you can Steele, C. Yards. (2009). J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 97 (6), 1045–1060. doi:/a0016239

Sex Opportunities 82 (3-4), 127–141

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A good., Montoya, A. K., and Jiang, L. (2017). Why are Particular Base sphere Far more Gender Well-balanced Than the others? Psychol. Bull. 143 (1), 1–thirty five. doi:/bul0000052

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., and you can Hudson, L. (2013). This new Stereotypical Computers Scientist: Gendered mass media Representations just like the a buffer so you’re able to Inclusion for women. doi:/s11199-013-0296-x

Sex Spots 69 (1-2), 58–71

Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, Elizabeth., and you will Lo, L cute teen girls american. (2013). Create gender-technology Stereotypes Expect Science Character and you will Research Field Dreams Certainly Student Science Majors? Soc. Psychol. Educ. sixteen (4), 541–554. doi:/s11218-013-9232-8

Destatis (2019). Studierende during the Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaft (MINT) und Technik-Fachern. Wiesbaden, Germany: People into the mathematics, computer system technology, science and you will techology (STEM) sphere . Recovered away from

Diekman, A good. B., Steinberg, M., Brownish, Elizabeth. R., Belanger, A beneficial. L., and Clark, Elizabeth. K. (2017). An objective Congruity Model of Character Entry, Involvement, and you may Leave: Understanding Communal Goal Procedure inside Base Gender Holes. Pers Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21 (2), 142–175. doi:868316642141

Eagly, An effective. H., and you may Karau, S. J. (2002). Part Congruity Principle of Prejudice toward Female Leaders. Psychol. Rev. 109 (3), 573–598. doi:-295x.109.step 3.573

Eagly, An excellent. H., and you will Timber, W. (2012). “Social Character Principle,” in Handbook out of Concepts from Public Therapy, Frequency II. Publishers P. van Lange, A good. Kruglanski, and you may E. Higgins (La, [Calif.]: SAGE ), 458–476. doi:446249222.n49

Eaton, Good. A beneficial., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., and you may Western, K. (2020). Exactly how Gender and you may Competition Stereotypes Change the Growth of Students into the STEM: Professors’ Biased Critiques out-of Physics and you may Biology Blog post-Doctoral Individuals. doi:/s11199-019-01052-w

Else-Journey, Letter. Yards., Hyde, J. S., and you will Linn, Yards. C. (2010). Cross-national Designs out-of Gender Variations in Math: A beneficial Meta-Study. Psychol. Bull. 136 (1), 103–127. doi:/a0018053

Gender Equality Bureau Pantry Office (2017). Gender Equivalence White Paper (Share Model. Tokyo, Japan: White report to the gender equality 2017 . Retrieved from

Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. An excellent., and you can Brooks, Good. W. (2015)pared in order to Guys, Feminine Take a look at Professional Creativity due to the fact Just as Doable, but Shorter Trendy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 112 (40), 12354–12359. doi:/pnas.1502567112

Gray, J. A good., and you will McN). The Neuropsychology from Nervousness: An inquiry with the Characteristics of friend Program. Oxford: Oxford College Press .

Greenwald, An excellent. Grams., McGhee, D. Age., and you can Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Computing Personal Differences in Implicit Knowledge: The new Implicit Relationship Shot. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480. doi://0022-.six.1464

Gudykunst, W. B., and Lee, C. Yards. (2003). Examining the brand new Validity out of Notice Construal Scales. Humm Res 29 (2), 253–274. doi:/j.1468-.tb00838.x

Heilman, Yards. Elizabeth., and you will Caleo, S. (2018)batting Gender Discrimination: A lack of Complement Structure. Category Techniques. Intergroup Interactions 21 (5), 725–744. doi:430218761587

Ikkatai, Y., Inoue, A good., Kano, K., Minamizaki, A beneficial., McKay, Age., and Yokoyama, H. M. (2019). Adult Egalitarian Attitudes to the Gender Opportunities Apply at Agreement toward Girls Bringing Stalk fields at college or university in Japan. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 41 (16), 2254–2270. doi:635

Ikkatai, Y., Minamizaki, A great., Kano, K., Inoue, A good., McKay, E., and you may Yokoyama, H. M. (2020). Gender-biased Societal Effect away from Stalk industries, Focusing on the brand new Dictate away from Egalitarian Perceptions on Gender Opportunities. Jcom 19 (01), A08. doi:3/2.19010208

Jasko, K., Pyrkosz?Pacyna, J., Czarnek, G., Dukala, K., and you will Szastok, Yards. (2020). Brand new Base Graduate: Immediately after Graduation, Anyone Currently Differ within the Work Effects, Attributions to achieve your goals, and you will Wanted Work Characteristics. J. Soc. Activities 76 (3), 512–542. doi:/josi.12392

Kemmelmeier, Meters. (2016). Cultural Variations in Questionnaire Responding: Circumstances and you can Wisdom on Study of Response Biases. Int. J. Psychol. 51 (6), 439–444. doi:/ijop.12386